This is often supposed to be the "head to" powder-or darn near to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge one particular could handload. It is the muse for a great number of pet loads, however I have not been pleased with the final results.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's got a shorter grain measurement, consequently, the designation SC or shorter Slice. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to stream in the powder measures additional effortlessly, assisting to alleviate the continual slicing of granules.
This is among the biggest explanations reloaders are admonished to utilize new data only; and to start out very low every time you will get a completely new lots of powder. You don't really know (Until the organization informs you so) that the new lots of powder was even produced at a similar manufacturing facility given that the powder you acquire a few years back.
Sweet!! I am going to pick some up and give it a try out. Thank you men, I enjoy it! I will Enable you to know very well what I find out. I do have about a fifty percent pound of 4350 I'm able to check out that to start with and find out what transpires.
In any case, I knew The 2 lbs of H4831SC used the exact same data, but I did not know whether there was just about anything diverse amongst a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and a person not so labeled. A phone to Hodgdon verified that they had been in reality identical and the only variation was The emblem within the label.
It is most likely that no further more dialogue is needed, in which circumstance we advocate setting up a brand new thread. If on the other hand you're feeling your reaction is required you can still accomplish that.
If there is not any load data it really is mainly because this powder is not appropriate for this cartridge. Ordinarily one will never come across one powder to suit all cartridges, and also the family of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you will be asking about won't perform.
Chances are you'll possibly: one) Go on and possess the merchandise stated down below automatically removed from your shopping cart:
dioni.a.312 said: In my practical experience the only real variation would be that the shortcut meters far better as a result of reloading gear. The moment It is loaded theres no useful difference. I've listened to which the shortcut may have a small little bit faster burn up h4831sc load data rate but it seems insignificant. Click on to develop...
Why would I mention this? Just what exactly is my point? I'm not sure that there is a actual valid position besides what is well-liked with most has not been well-liked with me in any way in these situation. Do I just Use a powder jinx or a little something? In order to show you how crazy I really am, tomorrow I am assortment testing a pals new .
This is an more mature thread, you might not receive h4831 vs h4831sc a reaction, and will be reviving an previous thread. Be sure to take into account developing a new thread.
Indeed, You may use the identical load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, although the SC version could assist you to get a little far more in cases where you are maxing h4831sc out situation volume Along with the conventional powder prior to reaching strain boundaries.
Nevertheless IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you will find that in many situations, in which one of them is listed the other will likely be also. Also, you'll find there is a fairly reliable romance in between them in regards to outlined loads.
If I have a pound or two of a powder and obtain far more of a similar, only a different great deal amount, I will combine them all up to ensure I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.